![]() ![]() |
|||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dirty Secrets: Research on abuse limited, but indicates a pervasive problem
Monday, November 01, 1999 By Jane Elizabeth Zemel, Post-Gazette Education Writer
Few studies or hard data on abusive teachers exist. And the academic research that has been done yields somewhat different results.
But all indicate the problem is more pervasive than many people imagine.
That statistic has caused some controversy, especially among educators. And that points to one reason so few abuse studies are conducted: Researchers are hesitant to scrutinize such a volatile topic that could alienate them from their academic peers.
"This is a tough field," said Dr. Michael Bersin, an education professor at the University of South Florida in Tampa. "You take your shots" from other educators, he said.
Education Week's deputy managing editor, Stephen Drummond, said his research on "A Trust Betrayed" was "the most controversial thing I've worked on." When an abridged version of the series was reprinted in "Teacher" magazine, angry teachers sent letters to Drummond and his co-writer Caroline Hendrie. One writer called it "sensationalism" and "a disgrace."
When Wishnictsky completed his study, even he questioned the high number of sexual misconduct reports. But he stands by his research, which he conducted by sending questionnaires to recent high school graduates in North Carolina and collecting official records from the state department of education.
"Even if students were overreporting by two times," Wishnictsky said, "there's a high percentage of sexual harassment that goes unreported."
Bersin agreed. "It's an underreported crime," he said. "Any statistics we have can be questioned."
|